Print This Post
a moral imperative for victims?
Posted on August 18, 2005 | Filed Under humility, justice
When hateful people produce lasting hatred in us … hate wins. When violent people make us violent … violence wins. When cruel people leave us with nothing but a burning desire for revenge in our minds and hearts … cruelty wins. When evil done to us gives birth to evil done by us … evil wins.
As I drove to work this morning, I listened to reports on NPR of the Israeli pullout from the Gaza strip. I heard interviews with militant Palestinians who credited the pullout to the armed resistance alone, giving no credit to the political process, showing no support for the diplomatic efforts of their own leadership, calling only for more violence to oust Israel from the West Bank as well. It was most disheartening.
It was disheartening to see once more that steps toward peace — baby steps though they may be — do so little (do nothing!) to soften the hardened and entrenched hatred of one people for another, do so little (do nothing?) to change the tide of history and move people toward rapprochement.
Is there a moral imperative for victims? Or does their victimization “excuse” whatever choices they may make? Can we expect the victim of oppression to show grace and mercy and restraint and maybe even love to the oppressor? Or is that a preposterous expectation?
There can be no shalom until victimizer and victim alike are set free from the cycle of oppression. There can be no shalom until the oppressors humble themselves before God and until the oppressed humble themselves before God. There can be no shalom until God does it … and until we are ready to let God do it!
Tags: grace, humility, peace, revengeRelated posts
- killing bin laden Yes, Osama bin Laden did evil things. Yes, he despoiled the image of God that was put in him as well as in each of us. But if we allow ...
- thirty-three prayer flags Yesterday, as classes resumed at Virginia Tech, students gathered around a display of thirty-three white prayer flags. Thirty-three flags … one each for the thirty-three people who died the previous Monday ...
- fighting terror … a different way “I realize now how precious life is,” said Anthony Aversano, whose father, Louis, was killed in the World Trade Center. “How I fight the terror in me today is to ...
- why the death penalty is wrong The death penalty is wrong because it serves no moral or practical purpose. 1) The death penalty is not an effective deterrent. Jeffrey Fagan, Columbia Law School professor, offers this testimony: Recent ...
- a conversation that needs to happen, but won’t From today’s New York Times: Bush Vows Not to Negotiate on Iraq Timetable A defiant President Bush vowed today not to negotiate with Congress about setting a date for withdrawing American ...
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | Leave a Comment
Comments
Leave a Reply
