Print This Post
ehren watada: true patriot or dangerous subversive?
Posted on February 7, 2007 | Filed Under war
Ehren Watada is a lieutentant in the United States Army. He refused to deploy to Iraq with his unit, claiming that the war in Iraq is illegal. He is currently being tried by a military court on charges of abandoning his unit and of conduct unbecoming an officer.
Is he a good man, a brave man, a conscientious citizen for refusing to “go along” with an action that he considers illegal and immoral, even when such a refusal subjects him to censure and dismissal from his job?
Or is he a disgrace, an opportunist, a dangerous threat to the chain of command necessary to permit the effective functioning of “the guardians of American freedoms?”
Read these two divergent assessments of the man and his actions … and let me know what you think!
Watada took talk too far … an opinion piece by Danny Westneat in The Seattle Times
What Watada did is military disobedience. And no matter how opposed you may be to this war, you’ve got to stop and think: Do we really want officers who run the most powerful fighting machine in the history of the world deciding what rules to follow as they go along? Even if this time you might agree with this particular officer?
Conduct Unbecoming … a blog post by Jayne Lyn Stahl
Tags: iraq, warWhile making public disparaging remarks about a war in progress is deemed to be an actionable offense, Watada argues that “under military law those in the military are allowed to refuse, in fact, have a right to refuse unlawful orders.” It is his belief that the U.S. is in Iraq under false pretexts, and illegally; he thinks it is his duty to refuse those orders.
Related posts
- disheartened, but not surprised Many Troops Say Torture OK is the title of an article posted at Military.com. The article discusses a report released today by the Army Medical Department detailing the results of ...
- actions speak louder than words When the government of the United States speaks, we speak, and when it acts, we act, because our government is, as President Lincoln put it, “a government of the people, ...
- more debate over interrogation guidelines From the Boston Globe, September 18, 2006: In the fight over rules for the interrogation and trials of terrorism suspects, there is a split — not so much between Republicans and ...
- common ground An article worth sharing … Looking for an argument (In December 13, 2005 issue of The Christian Century) Will the debate over homosexuality split the church of Jesus Christ? It already has. ...
- with liberty and justice for all From the Los Angeles Times, June 5, 2006: The Pentagon has decided to omit from new detainee policies a key tenet of the Geneva Convention that explicitly bans “humiliating and degrading ...
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | Leave a Comment
Comments
Leave a Reply
