Print This Post
some thoughts on terrorism
Posted on April 12, 2007 | Filed Under politics, terrorism
Some thoughts provoked by a lecture I heard last Monday evening delivered by Dr. Louise Richardson. Her latest book: What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy, Containing the Threat
- Dr. Richardson spoke of the importance of “following our own rules.” I agree. It is beyond foolish to jettison our highest principles — our esteem for the rule of law and our commitment to human rights for all people — for the sake of protecting ourselves and “our way of life.” We are only dooming our way of life in the process, as well as severely undermining any international credibility we might have had in calling other nations and leaders to account.
- “Terrorism” has become a catchall term, used to define — and defame — any “enemy” of any sort. When we refer to “The Terrorists” without any further elaboration, as if “The Terrorists” were a monolithic, coordinated opposition, it only confuses things. We are threatened not by “The Terrorists,” but by a variety of terrorists groups, each with their own distinct grievances, ideologies, political objectives, and modes of behavior: Al Qaeda, Hamas, Sunni insurgents, Shiite militias, etc. It is critical that we understand our enemies and what it is that drives their rage, even when it may mean acknowledging the legitimacy of some of their complaints.
- Dr. Richardson defines terrorism as the “deliberate targeting of non-combatants for the sake of some political objective.” It seems to me that an additional element of any terrorist organization is a perception of powerlessness. Terrorism is a tactic adopted by those who cannot “win” a fair fight, the response of the “little guys” to the “big bully,” resorting to cheating or trickery or unfair fighting to strike back at the bully. In this regard, it is interesting to note that as Hamas gained some legitimate political power, it began to back off somewhat from its terrorist rhetoric and tactics. Terrorism is the “weapon” of the oppressed and the weak (unwarranted and morally unjustifiable), just as militarism is the “weapon” of the oppressor and the strong (just as unwarranted and just as morally unjustifiable!).
- In that case, it is clear why a “bullying” response to terrorism is useless. It merely confirms the terrorist’s point of view and redoubles the determination to go on. The only way to defuse or contain terrorism is to stop the bullying … and to share power! But that is the one thing we are not prepared to do. We want to dictate the terms for the rest of the world. Unfortunately, as long as we insist on doing so, we provide a ripe environment for the growth of terrorism.
Related posts
- grim reaper I heard a report today on NPR about the next generation Predator, a military drone called the MQ-9 Reaper. The Defense Update website says of the Reaper: The availability of high ...
- filled with power When the Holy Spirit comes upon you, you will be filled with power, and you will be witnesses for me … That’s what Jesus promised his first apostles: you will be ...
- detainee bill passes senate John Kerry (Democrat): This bill gives an administration that lobbied for torture exactly what it wanted. No, this administration did not lobby for torture. It lobbied for a free and unfettered ...
- “christian hate” should be an oxymoron! I attach below an excerpt from a forwarded e mail I received the other day … … when I hear a story about a brave marine roughing up an Iraqi terrorist ...
- i’m back I’m back … after twenty-six days of vacation, 5300 miles on the road, passing through eighteen states and two provinces, time shared with many, many friends and dear family members, ...
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | 2 Comments
Comments
2 Responses to “some thoughts on terrorism”
Leave a Reply

I couldn’t agree more.
The point about terrorists is not that they target non-combatants but that they use methods calculated to inspire terror (or, as someone once put it, shock and awe).
Thanks for the comment, Steve. I have purchased Dr. Richardson’s book and am looking forward to reviewing her arguments in more detail. I pray for a world where terrorism will not be allowed to dictate the terms under which we make foreign policy.