Print This Post
if at first you don’t succeed …
Posted on May 16, 2007 | Filed Under justice, terrorism
It’s hard to see how this is just or fair by any definition. If this is the practice, why go through the bother of a hearing at all? Why pretend to adhere to any rule of law?
The military system of determining whether detainees are properly held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, includes an unusual practice: If Pentagon officials disagree with the result of a hearing, they order a second one, or even a third, until they approve of the finding.
Read the rest of the New York Times article: Guantánamo Detainees’ Suit Challenges Fairness of Military’s Repeat Hearings.
Tags: detainees, rule_of_lawRelated posts
- nrdc update: good news! Good news on the endangered species front … The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will withdraw its decision to remove endangered species protections from the gray wolf in the Northern Rockies, ...
- secret proceedings From a March 8, 2007 article by Andrew Buncombe in The Independent: Campaigners have condemned the Bush administration’s plan to proceed with secret proceedings [Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRT)] against 14 ...
- ny times on torture compromise: a bad bargain It is the rule of law that protects citizens and nations from tyranny. When we agree together to adhere to a law that binds both of us/all of us then ...
- torture is not a partisan issue Torture is not a partisan issue. It is an issue of conscience. It’s not about citing extreme circumstances, but about applying a universal standard of human ethics. It’s not about ...
- fighting terror … a different way “I realize now how precious life is,” said Anthony Aversano, whose father, Louis, was killed in the World Trade Center. “How I fight the terror in me today is to ...
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | Leave a Comment
Comments
Leave a Reply
