Comments on: nrdc update: 37 wolves killed http://www.firstcongucc.org/weblog/2008/05/02/nrdc-update-37-wolves-killed/ looking at the world through the eyes of faith in Jesus Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:14:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Debby http://www.firstcongucc.org/weblog/2008/05/02/nrdc-update-37-wolves-killed/comment-page-1/#comment-32230 Debby Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:39:38 +0000 http://www.firstcongucc.org/weblog/?p=287#comment-32230 @ John: "If you and your church would but half the time into saving babies as you do saving animals the world would be a different place." You're right, there would be 12 billion people on this planet and no animals left. We'd have used up all the resources by now and the wilderness would have been long reduced to the concrete jungle of shopping malls. The wolves need protecting because they are so rare... are humans so rare? or even worth saving?? HELL NO. I say good riddance and step up the abortion rate! Over half the human population is a waste of space anyway. @ John: “If you and your church would but half the time into saving babies as you do saving animals the world would be a different place.”

You’re right, there would be 12 billion people on this planet and no animals left. We’d have used up all the resources by now and the wilderness would have been long reduced to the concrete jungle of shopping malls.

The wolves need protecting because they are so rare… are humans so rare? or even worth saving?? HELL NO. I say good riddance and step up the abortion rate! Over half the human population is a waste of space anyway.

]]> By: John Gibson http://www.firstcongucc.org/weblog/2008/05/02/nrdc-update-37-wolves-killed/comment-page-1/#comment-20030 John Gibson Tue, 06 May 2008 13:51:31 +0000 http://www.firstcongucc.org/weblog/?p=287#comment-20030 I find it very interesting while checking out this blog that the dealth of wolves be mentioned but nothing about the millions of babies being aborted anually. I find the situation very similar. The wolves are unwanted by the land owners whos property they inhabit. The unborn baby is unwanted by the mother whos whomb they inhabit. The UCC has taken a very clear stance in the past few years that an abortion is a womens choice. So why isn't the killing of wolves the land owners choice. I think I may understand people are plentiful but wolves are indangered. Makes a lot of sense!! If you and your church would but half the time into saving babies as you do saving animals the world would be a different place. John I find it very interesting while checking out this blog that the dealth of wolves be mentioned but nothing about the millions of babies being aborted anually. I find the situation very similar. The wolves are unwanted by the land owners whos property they inhabit. The unborn baby is unwanted by the mother whos whomb they inhabit. The UCC has taken a very clear stance in the past few years that an abortion is a womens choice. So why isn’t the killing of wolves the land owners choice. I think I may understand people are plentiful but wolves are indangered. Makes a lot of sense!! If you and your church would but half the time into saving babies as you do saving animals the world would be a different place.

John

]]>