renewed debate about lethal injection
Posted on December 19, 2006 | Filed Under death penalty
From an article by Oren Dorell and Kevin Johnson, USA TODAY:
The questions over lethal injection that have led executions to be halted in Florida and California are likely to curb the use of the death penalty across the USA, according to analysts who support capital punishment and others who oppose it.
However, it’s unclear whether the increasing focus on whether lethal injection is unconstitutionally painful represents a significant and lasting turn against the death penalty or a temporary slowdown in executions that will end once procedures for injections are improved.
“I think we’re headed towards fewer executions,” says Deborah Denno, …
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | Leave a Comment
wise words from amnesty international on the saddam verdict
Posted on November 6, 2006 | Filed Under death penalty, justice
From Malcolm Smart of Amnesty International:
Every accused has a right to a fair trial, whatever the magnitude of the charge against them. This plain fact was routinely ignored through the decades of Saddam Hussein’s tyranny. His overthrow opened the opportunity to restore this basic right and, at the same time, to ensure, fairly, accountability for the crimes of the past. It is an opportunity missed and made worse by the imposition of the death penalty.
Read the rest of the Amnesty International commentary on the Saddam trial.
Tony Blair also acknowledged Britain’s opposition to the death sentence: We are against …
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | 1 Comment
a sick and perverted spectacle
Posted on December 13, 2005 | Filed Under death penalty, justice
A sick and perverted spectacle …
Those are the words Stanley Tookie Williams used to characterize his impending execution. Williams was executed early this morning, after appeals for a stay of execution were denied by the California Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, and after a plea for clemency was rejected by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
It was a sick and perverted spectacle …
… not because an innocent man was put to death. It is entirely possible that Williams did not commit the murders for which he was convicted; he always maintained his innocence. …
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | Leave a Comment
a shameful milestone
Posted on December 2, 2005 | Filed Under death penalty, justice
The execution by lethal injection of Kenneth Lee Boyd in North Carolina marked the 1000th execution in the United States since the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976. A report by Amnesty International reveals that in 2004, the United States executed more human beings than any other nation with the exception of China, Iran, and Vietnam. For more on today’s execution and the reaction to it, click on the following link:
World News Article | Reuters.co.uk
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | Leave a Comment
redemption
Posted on December 1, 2005 | Filed Under justice
Is redemption possible?
Yes.
Should the execution of Stanley Tookie Williams be stayed because his life has been redeemed, because his life now has some redeeming value?
No.
If Mr. Williams should not be executed because he has succeeded in turning his life around, it follows that if he had not done so, he should be executed. But he should not. There is no good reason, no justification, to execute anyone.
It is we who need redemption — redemption from our need for retribution, redemption from our reliance on violence to address our fears (even if it has the blessing of the state), redemption from …
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | Leave a Comment
why the death penalty is wrong
Posted on October 28, 2005 | Filed Under death penalty, justice
The death penalty is wrong because it serves no moral or practical purpose.
1) The death penalty is not an effective deterrent. Jeffrey Fagan, Columbia Law School professor, offers this testimony:
Recent studies claiming that executions reduce murders have fueled the revival of deterrence as a rationale to expand the use of capital punishment. Such strong claims are not unusual in either the social or natural sciences, but like nearly all claims of strong causal effects from any social or legal intervention, the claims of a “new deterrence” fall apart under close scrutiny. These new studies are fraught with technical …
About this Post
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Article | Leave a Comment
